It is very wondrous and naive to think of the Philosophy of Science as not a part of Science. It is merely innocence. From Socrates to Russell, from Newton to Dyson, everyone intelligently used this philosophy as a weapon to turn down the disturbances and get the very thing they wanted. In fact, intellectuals used this in their private life too.

By definition, Philosophy of Science seems nothing but an old-school study. And that deceives the overall person pursuing science to think relatively modern. And by modern, we mean something extraordinary. However, in quite a sense, remarkable and unparalleled are basically locations inside philosophy. But going through the works of Kant says nothing, I mean supposedly, about the cultural science. This cultural science is nothing but the experimental science that is usually derived from theoretical works. 

Here, Kant (1) is talking innocently about physics, and if we agree to a point, then we might lose the other point we were holding then. And yet if we are not satisfied, we are in a state of war with ourselves. However, if we are adequately met, we defeat a so-called monstrous idea. However, the outlandish idea is still a golden idea for someone else.

Conclusively, philosophy tells us much about War (2). However, this war is not dangerous (until a political angle jumps in), because it is some ideological war. And if we patiently derive what we would gain, then it would be some answers and confusions: Technically, both. The philosophy of science teaches us the importance of doing science, not just cultural science (or empirical), but also the science that deserves to be studied. While doing so, the individual must not be deceived by evils' ideas, otherwise, the person would be paralyzed in a peculiar non-cultural and baloney science. 

References and Footnotes

1) Citing Immanuel Kant works, such as Critique of Pure Reason, Critique of Practical Reason, etc. 

2) It is quite an educational war.